I found this super interesting post about
creativity and how it´s increased on Online University.
Are you creative? Want to be...? Read this (or, as the article suggests: go for a run, learn a language or meditate!)
Just like it kills
mental health, the heart, and pretty much everything else. Stress negatively
impacts creative expression, particularly when it involves rigid timeframes and
criteria. According to psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, no gene or any other factor
predisposes some individuals toward creativity and others not (this perspective
is, obviously, disputed). External factors such as stress play a much heavier
role in determining innovation than anything intrinsic.
Dr. Nancy
Andreasen, who wrote The Creating Brain: The
Neuroscience of Genius, may not be able to scientifically explain how
creativity and genius emerge, but she does know how they inspire and impact the
great thinkers. All people experience moments of "ordinary
creativity," which permeates daily tasks. But the artist, composers,
scientists, writers, and others qualifying as geniuses typically talk of
oneiric "flashes" setting off their most notable, iconic works.
Because dopamine
increases along with positive reinforcement and other rewards, some
neurobiologists (like Dr. David Sweatt) believe it easily correlates with
creativity, too. Either receiving money or the simple satisfaction of a job
well done might stimulate levels of innovation, and dopamine in kind. Such a
link still exists as a theory, albeit one that does go a long way in explaining
the sometimes inexplicable.
All creative
pursuits start when the thinker perceives an external stimulus and processes it
in his and/or her mind. More complex than merely seeing, the "engines of
our ingenuity" hook up imagery with imagination. Personal differences in
this inevitable linkage lead to creative output and adroitly explain why some
people end up with the particular results they do and keep society pushing
forward.
Theories regarding
creativity’s true origins abound, and some think one’s aptitude may be
determined by his or her brain chemistry and structure. University of New
Mexico’s Rex Jung believes that if you have less of certain neurological
phenomena, you’re better off when it comes to creative pursuits. Specific
chemicals froth about in smaller dosages, while white matter sits weaker and
the frontal lobe’s cortical regions are thinner. Interestingly enough, brains
testing higher on intelligence tests feature the exact opposite composition.
Generally speaking, of course.
During creative
moments, the left frontal cortex experiences comparatively more sluggish
activity, which also correlates with the aforementioned decreased white matter
and connecting axons. Unlike intelligence, creativity tends to thrive when
thinking slows down, although "flashes" of inspiration and insight
occur with the speed of flashes. Emotions and some cognitive processes happen
in this particular region as well, which scientists such as Dr. Jung believe
encourage abstract and novelty thought processes.
When hitting a
creative snag, the best thing thinkers can do for themselves is step away and
try to look at everything from a completely different point of view. Studies
have shown that the most consistently creative individuals display a
willingness to approach their challenges from a wide variety of angles beyond
their initial inklings. Putting some space between original perspectives and
newer ones encourages abstract thinking, a crucial component in the inventive
process.
Mel Rhodes’
inquiries into the creative mind — which required him to research around 50
takes on the subject — eventually led him to break everything down into the
person, process, and environment components. The person element, as you can
probably guess, involves one’s unique set of characteristics needed to think
and perceive things in an innovative, abstract fashion. Actually understanding
and formulating ideas and results is known as process, and environment means
the internal and external milieu in which the creative individual works.
When brain fog
starts rolling in, try a moderate amount of aerobic exercise to try and clear
it up. Rhode Island College scientists noted that the two hours after engaging
in such rigorous physical activity proved some of the most mentally fertile in
a 2005 study. They used the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking to measure how
well the participating thinkers performed with and without exercise.
Although from 1987,
this study’s findings showcase just how largely unknowable creativity’s true
face is these days, as it conflicts with some more contemporary theories
despite making just as much sense. Tests conducted on Brandeis University
creative writing students noted a dive in their motivation and thoughts
regarding their work when receiving rewards for their efforts. They approached
poetry with a lessened sense of intrinsic interest, a finding which ended up
applying to situations beyond the creative.
fMRIs and
improvised jazz form the crux of surgeon Charles Limb’s pioneering maps of the
creative process. His TEDxMidAtlantic lecture discussed his fascinating
findings regarding the physiology behind musical improvisation, specifically,
how it makes the Broca’s Area light up like the Fourth of July. Brain
scientists think this part is responsible for language development and
cognition, implying that one of the body’s most essential organs might
recognize music (and maybe even other expressive pursuits) as akin to speech.
Researchers
"may not have had [their] EUREKA moment" when it comes to proving a
link between bi- and multilingualism, but compelling evidence certainly exists.
Individuals capable of speaking more than one language generally display more
competent multitasking skills and improved cognition, both usually labeled key
ingredients to creative thinking. Most telling, however, is that they seem
better able to analyze situations and stimuli from multiple angles, which
nearly everyone attempting to define creativity considers essential.
That doesn’t mean
all creative folks ought not be trusted, nor that their opposites are always
the most honest sorts, of course. But individuals capable of more novel and
abstract thoughts — and possessing more flexible moral fibers —
"enjoy" a higher risk of less-than-trustworthy behaviors. Multiple
studies show that the ability to concoct more solid, viable stories and view
scenarios and stimuli from many angles dull the chances of getting caught.
Harvard, like many
other institutions of higher learning, hopes to try and unlock creativity’s
beautiful and bizarre secrets. Dr. Shelley Carson, notable for developing a new
standard to measure the mysterious phenomenon, wants to try and find a definitive
relationship between intelligence and creative thinking. Some of her earlier
studies note that both increase together at the 120, 130, and 150 IQ levels,
but more research is needed to prove any sort of solid correlation.
Painting all
creative types as insane — particularly the influential and genius — always has
been and probably always will be a rather tired cliché, albeit a cliché that
might actually hold some cachet. Their brains have been proven to open up more
to external sources and possess greater memory capacity than others, but such a
perk does come burdened with some unfortunate side effects. Overstimulation
might very well result, which can pique (or worsen) anxiety and depressive
disorders.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your insights :)
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.