Sometimes I meet
communication advisors or so called experts who claim they can interpret consumers from
what they read in data bases filled with demographic facts and responses to
quant studies. It always frightens me to hear them say they “know for sure” how
people think and feel because they can back it up with a number or a handly
little %. You can´t. There is a huge difference between facts and insights.
There is a huge difference between what people say and what they do. There is a
huge difference between the rational and the emotional. Databases are great to
back up instincts, but they are useless on their own, and building a marketing
campaign based on what your target has told you in a survey is dangerous – and lazy.
ScienceDaily presented
the other day a study that is of interest for marketers who wish to reach
people with different personalities, and at least understand that one person differs
from another on a deeper and more complex level than age, neighbourhood or
gender.
“Murray and co-authors Remi Trudel of Boston
University and June Cotte from the University of Western Ontario found that
when it comes to our basic consumer motivations, how we experience a good or
bad service experience or how we react to a superior or inferior product
depends on whether we're prone to seeking pleasure or avoiding pain. This
translates into two groups who show very different levels of satisfaction for
the same consumer experience.
The pleasure-versus-pain principle
The researchers studied people's reactions to two
consumer experiences: tasting a cup of coffee and choosing a digital camera. In
both studies, there was a quality product and one that had been altered to
affect its quality. Test subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with
the product's quality. The researchers discovered that respondents fell into
two categories: promotion-focused (pleasure-seeking) or prevention-focused
(pain-avoiding). "These two types of people respond very differently to
having the same kind of service encounter or having the same kind of problem
with a product," said Murray.
"People who are promotion-focused tend to get
a lot more hurt when something goes wrong, but they're also a lot happier when
something goes right," he said. "The prevention-focused people are
less upset when something goes wrong -- when they buy a product and it breaks
or they have a bad service experience -- but they're also less happy when
something goes right."
Can't get no satisfaction? It may be a conservative
bias
Murray notes that although the prevention-focused
response was far less extreme than the promotion-focused response, the
pain-avoiding group appeared less able to enjoy a positive consumer experience.
As a consequence, their controlled reactions left them feeling less joy when
something went right -- a phenomenon the researchers labelled a conservative
bias.
"That conservative bias changes the way they
see the world," he said. "They're a little bit more constrained in
all their responses, at least in the realm of satisfaction."
The study was published in the March 2012 issue of
the International Journal of Research
in Marketing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your insights :)
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.